- Microsoft exec describes AI scraping as “astonishing theft” of labor
- Copilot reportedly reduced NYT click-throughs by 93% compared with Bing
- Trump administration supports scraping so that the US can retain its AI dominance
In an earlier January 2023 memo uncovered in recently unredacted court filings, Microsoft Director of Applied Science Brent Hecht accused AI scraping of being an “astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions”
With generative AI posing a “real risk” of disrupting the employment of the same people who unwillingly provided that training data, Hecht went on to describe scraping as “the largest theft of labor in human history.”
This comes from a 2023 New York Times case against Microsoft and OpenAI, when the publication accused the AI giants of copying and using its copyrighted work without permission.
AI scraping described as mass theft
Microsoft’s own internal research reportedly found that Copilot could reduce click-throughs to The New York Times by as much as 93% compared with its own conventional search engine, Bing.
Ultimately, the company has fundamentally admitted that LLMs could undermine the foundations of their own content supply chain, with Hecht introducing the theory of a “doom loop.”
Importantly, the company’s CEO, Satya Nadella, even admitted that had he known OpenAI was scraping data found behind paywalls, he would have exercised Microsoft’s rights to require OpenAI to retrain its models, excluding this protected data.
As for OpenAI, the ChatGPT maker allegedly removed copyright notices from material before it entered the large datasets so that the models wouldn’t re-generate those copyright notices for users.
The case accuses OpenAI’s mid-training datasets of including over 91,000 pieces of work from The New York Times, Daily News and the Center for Investigative Reporting.
While the general argument over the use of copyrighted content continues and the case against OpenAI remains open, the Trump administration did recently side with AI makers like OpenAI.
“Constraining LLM development under a misunderstanding of fair use doctrine would thwart such creative and scientific progress while hindering American prosperity and economic mobility,” a statement of interest from the US Government reads.
In the meantime, this public debate is likely to last years and hundreds of other publications are likely to be impacted by unsolicited AI scraping fueling rival chatbots.
