Close Menu
MyAppsPlus

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Github competitor Entire is live now – how the agent-first platform works

    October 26, 2026

    ClearNym data removal service review

    October 26, 2026

    Own Microsoft Office Pro Plus outright for $50 ($250 value)

    October 26, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    MyAppsPlusMyAppsPlus
    Monday, October 26
    • Home
    • Breaking Tech
    • Apps & Software
    • AI & Automation
    • Android
    • iPhone & iOS
    • More
      • Reviews
      • How-To Guides
      • Deals & Discounts
      • Shop
    MyAppsPlus
    Home»iPhone & iOS»Apple and Amazon face renewed UK antitrust lawsuit
    iPhone & iOS

    Apple and Amazon face renewed UK antitrust lawsuit

    myappsplusBy myappsplusSeptember 29, 2026014 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email Telegram WhatsApp
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Apple and Amazon face renewed UK antitrust lawsuit
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    A UK tribunal has allowed part of a renewed antitrust lawsuit against Apple and Amazon to move forward, over allegations that the companies restricted competition for Apple and Beats products sold on Amazon. Here are the details.

    A bit of context

    Back in 2023, Apple and Amazon were hit with a proposed UK class action over a 2018 agreement that allegedly restricted which third-party sellers could offer Apple and Beats products through Amazon’s marketplace, reducing competition and, as a result, driving up prices for consumers.

    It is worth noting that the UK was not the only market where the agreement drew scrutiny. Apple and Amazon have faced antitrust investigations and legal challenges over similar reseller restrictions in countries including Italy, Spain, Germany, and the United States.

    In the British lawsuit, a class representative led by consumer law academic Christine Riefa accused the companies of reducing competition and driving up prices for consumers buying Apple and Beats products in the UK.

    Last year, however, Britain’s Competition Appeal Tribunal refused to certify the case, citing concerns about how the lawsuit was being financed and about Riefa’s ability to independently protect the interests of the class.

    The court took particular issue with the fact that, under the funding agreement, Asertis (which was financing the litigation in exchange for a success fee) could potentially have been paid out of any damages award before consumers received anything. The tribunal said the arrangement could even have resulted in the class receiving no damages at all.

    “Our overall impression was that Prof Riefa was extremely reliant on her legal
    advisers. We were not convinced that she had properly understood the
    arrangements into which the PCR had entered on behalf of the Proposed Class
    Members, and we were concerned about her ability to protect the interests of
    the class robustly and independently.”

    “Our key concern in this case is that Prof Riefa has not demonstrated sufficient
    independence or robustness so as to act fairly and adequately in the interests of
    the class.”

    In its conclusion, the tribunal said a class representative cannot be “merely a figurehead” for proceedings being conducted by their lawyers, and that they should “act as the independent advocate for the class.”

    The claim was later refiled by a new proposed class representative, Justin Le Patourel, which brings us to today.

    UK tribunal allows part of lawsuit to proceed

    As Britain’s Competition Appeal Tribunal today allowed part of the refiled lawsuit to proceed, while narrowing the case to claims involving Apple products purchased through Amazon’s marketplace

    The tribunal allowed claims ​relating to Apple products bought through Amazon’s marketplace to proceed, but rejected ⁠one covering those bought directly from Apple and other retailers.

    Judge Kelyn Bacon said claims relating to Amazon marketplace purchases were “plausible, credible ‌and ⁠grounded in the facts”, but rejected wider claims relating to other retailers because they rested on a “complex and speculative theory of harm”.

    Reuters says the portion of the lawsuit now allowed to proceed could be worth between £289 million and £306 million, including interest.

    Commenting on the decision, Apple told Reuters that its agreement with Amazon was intended to curb the sale of counterfeit products, and maintained that it “strongly” disagrees with the lawsuit.

    Amazon, in turn, said it is confident the remaining claim will prove to be “without merit” as the legal process moves forward.

    Finally, Reuters says a spokesperson for Le Patourel “welcomed the ruling, but said it was disappointing ​that parts ⁠of the claim were not certified.”

    To read Reuters‘ full report on today’s decision, follow this link.

    Worth checking out on Amazon

    You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

    Amazon Apple Face News ReNewed
    Follow on Google News Follow on Flipboard
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link
    myappsplus
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Apple adds more Siri AI tools in its 27.2 system updates, out today

    October 26, 2026

    Gemini Live redesign makes it easier to add context to chats

    October 26, 2026

    I’ve been using Android’s iPad Mini OLED for months, and it’s the better tiny tablet

    October 26, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Cathay Pacific tests Google AI that dramatically cuts airplane contrails — tiny altitude shifts slash environmental impact by 40% in early trials

    September 8, 2026137 Views

    Keep running out of mobile data? This new unlimited plan gets you up to 80Mbps 5G speeds for just AU$50/m

    October 8, 202615 Views

    Drone swarm tech valued by both defense and civilian sectors, industry platform says

    September 8, 202615 Views
    Latest Reviews

    Anthropic’s new Fable release is cheaper, less restrictive

    myappsplusSeptember 2, 2026

    iPhone 18 Pro vs. iPhone 17 Pro: Should you upgrade this year?

    myappsplusSeptember 2, 2026

    Enjoy low-and-slow BBQ with East Oak’s 30-inch electric smokers starting from $207

    myappsplusSeptember 2, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    Anthropic’s new Fable release is cheaper, less restrictive

    September 2, 20260 Views

    Enjoy low-and-slow BBQ with East Oak’s 30-inch electric smokers starting from $207

    September 2, 20260 Views

    NYC schools announce major classroom technology overhaul

    September 2, 20260 Views
    Our Picks

    Github competitor Entire is live now – how the agent-first platform works

    October 26, 2026

    ClearNym data removal service review

    October 26, 2026

    Own Microsoft Office Pro Plus outright for $50 ($250 value)

    October 26, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Subscribe to our newsletter and get the latest tech news, app updates, AI trends, smartphone reviews, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Get In Touch
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2026 MyAppsPlus. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.