The artificial intelligence boom has an expensive side effect: The components powering tomorrow’s technology are making today’s gadgets harder to afford. Reuters reports that demand from AI data centers is squeezing memory supplies and raising costs for smartphone and computer manufacturers. The same memory boom lifting chipmakers’ prospects creates a difficult choice for their customers: absorb the expense or pass it along.
For investors, that choice matters. Higher selling prices can support revenue, but they don’t automatically mean stronger profits. When shoppers postpone upgrades, a strategy built around charging more can start delivering less.
More News from Barchart
Apple (AAPL) may be approaching that limit just as its most expensive new iPhone prepares to launch.
iPhone Order Cuts Flash a Warning
Nikkei Asia reports that Apple has reduced October component orders for the iPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max by 15% to 20% from initial plans. Its sources blame softer demand and higher prices. The reductions affect selected suppliers, with differing production schedules complicating the picture. November adjustments remain uncertain.
Here’s the point investors shouldn’t miss: These cuts concern the Pro models, not the $1,999 foldable iPhone Duo. Apple’s launch announcement puts the Duo’s availability at Oct. 23. Calling it a flop would be premature. Treating the cheaper models’ struggles as a warning is reasonable.
Apple lists starting prices of $1,199 for the Pro and $1,299 for the Pro Max. The Duo therefore asks buyers to spend another $700 over the Pro Max—approximately 54% more. That premium needs to purchase something customers genuinely value.
Higher Prices Have Their Limits
It’s important to separate pricing power from pricing necessity. Reuters reports that both Pro models cost $100 more than their predecessors as memory expenses climb. Raising prices to cover rising costs doesn’t necessarily expand profitability. It can simply keep margins from shrinking—provided customers keep buying.
A 10% price increase combined with 15% fewer purchases produces 6.5% less revenue. While that isn’t an Apple forecast, and component orders aren’t consumer sales, it shows why higher prices alone cannot rescue an upgrade cycle.
