The DOJ has won a temporary pause on an order requiring it to respond to <a href="https://myappsplus.com/apple-now-accepting-app-store-submissions-built-for-ios-27-macos-27-more/” title=”Apple now accepting App Store submissions built for iOS 27, macOS 27, more”>Apple’s requests for documents from 14 federal agencies, while the government appeals the ruling in its ongoing antitrust case against the company. Here are the details.
A bit of background
A few weeks ago, Special Master Judge Jose Linares sided with Apple in its effort to obtain documents from 14 federal agencies as part of the ongoing antitrust case brought against the company by the DOJ.
In a nutshell, Apple is seeking the documents to examine how these agencies evaluate privacy and security when setting smartphone policies and making purchasing decisions.
The company argues that the records could support its case that some of the practices challenged by the DOJ are legitimate product differentiators and security safeguards, rather than anticompetitive restrictions.
Specifically, Apple is seeking documents from these agencies:
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Defense
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
- General Services Administration
- Department of Labor
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
- National Security Agency (NSA)
- Office of the Director of National Intelligence
- Office of Management and Budget
- Office of Personnel Management
- Department of State
When Judge Linares sided with Apple, the DOJ asked him to reconsider the decision. After Linares rejected that request, the DOJ appealed his ruling to District Judge Julien Neals, and asked Linares to pause the discovery order while that appeal is considered.
Which brings us to today.
DOJ gets temporary relief
In a decision issued earlier today, Judge Linares granted the DOJ’s bid to pause the discovery order while District Judge Julien Neals considers the government’s appeal over whether it can be required to respond to Apple’s discovery requests for documents.
Judge Linares said that although he agrees with Apple that the DOJ faces “an uphill battle” in succeeding on its appeal, that alone wasn’t enough to deny the government’s request for a stay.
He also agreed with the DOJ’s argument that requiring the 14 agencies to undertake the “purportedly extensive amount of work” involved in responding to Apple’s discovery requests would be “simply unfair” if Judge Neals ultimately reverses his ruling.
Additionally, Judge Linares rejected Apple’s argument that pausing the decision while Judge Neals weighs whether to reverse it would prejudice the company by further delaying its efforts to obtain the documents. He said the case remains “very much in the earlier phases of discovery,” and that other discovery can continue in the meantime.
With that decision now stayed, Apple will have an opportunity to respond to the government’s appeal, after which the DOJ will have seven calendar days to file a reply. Judge Neals will then decide whether to uphold or reverse Judge Linares’ original discovery order.
You can read Judge Linares’s full decision below:
gov.uscourts.njd.544402.515.0Download
Worth checking out on Amazon
You’re reading 9to5Mac — experts who break news about Apple and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Mac on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel
